Election season is upon us and once again we are asked to cast a vote for the lesser of two evils. Another election based on promises – of freedom, of justice, of equality, and yet we can see with our own eyes that no matter who we vote for, each year descends into a more elaborate web of lies, castrating the people of their rights and sovereignty from the naivety of their own political blind spots.
Will the election bring welfare or warfare? Justice or inequality? Tranquility or fear? Are their promises for all the people or only the rich and powerful?
These are all questions that we should be asking right now, but meanwhile the question in most people’s minds is more along the lines of which candidate should I support.
And for that reason, here are the top five reasons you should NOT vote for Hillary Clinton on election day.
1) Her Wavering Stance On Gay Marriage
Many Hillary supporters see her as a strong progressive woman who would do a lot for gender equality and civil rights. That’s the platform that she’s running on anyway, but it could not be further from the truth. In actuality, she was against gay marriage allegedly for her entire life until just a few short years before running for president.
No – Hillary Clinton when asked whether or not New York state should legalize gay marriage, 2002
I believe that marriage is not just a bond, but a sacred bond between a man and a woman. – Hillary Clinton, 2004
I have not supported same sex marriage. I have supported civil partnerships and contractual relationships. – Hillary Clinton, 2010
Then in 2013, when the gay rights movement really took hold and shifted the democratic voter base, she changed her tune.
I support marriage for lesbian and gay couples. I support it personally and as a matter of policy and law. – Hillary Clinton, 2013
However, she did not support gay marriage as a matter of principle or law until only three years ago, and still hasn’t shown any tangible evidence to support that claim. It’s simply a political slight of hand to gain more votes from gullible voters.
2) She Has Taken Over $100 Million In Bribes From Foreign Nations And She Admits To Taking Her Orders From The CFR
Hillary is no peace candidate. Not only has she devastated countries like Libya during her time as secretary of state, but the amount of money she has taken from ruthless dictators of various foreign nations will truly astound you. On the Clinton Foundation website’s searchable database, you can find “Kingdom of Saudi Arabia” under the “between $10,000,001 and $25,000,000” category. Keep in mind, that Saudi Arabia is one of the most grotesque place on the planet in terms of human rights, where people are literally stoned to death or publicly executed for being gay.
The list goes on, including the state of Qatar at $1,375,000 to $5,800,000, another country where homosexuality is punishable by death. In fact, her donor list is filled with countries that have horrible human rights records.
In addition, she also admitted that she takes her marching orders from the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), a Rockefeller founded group that has come under fire throughout the years for promoting war and conflict in foreign policy, the opposite of what they were allegedly set up to do.
We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future – Hillary Clinton
Notably, The Rockefeller Foundation is also a major donor to the Clinton Foundation at $10,000,001 – $25,000,000.
3) She’s a Monsanto Puppet Who Will Push GMO’s On The World
Hillary is being called the “Bride of Frankenfood” for her outrageous support for genetically modified organisms (GMO).
I stand in favor of using seeds and products that have a proven track record…. And to continue to try to make the case for those who are skeptical that they may not know what they’re eating already. The question of genetically modified food or hybrids has gone on for many, many years. And there is again a big gap between what the facts are and what perceptions are. – Hillary Clinton, 2015
Actually Hillary, there really isn’t any resemblance to a “proven track record” for GMO’s and genetically modified organisms are not hybrids. She even said at one point that Africa is “begging” for GMO’s, but outside of Hillary’s fantasy world a top cotton producer in Africa recently announced their plan to phase out GMO’s because of terrible quality problems, complaining that the GMO cotton was ‘economically unviable‘. GMO cotton produces shorter strands which affect the strength of yarn and the speed at which it can be spun.
“The cotton fibre we are producing today is short.” – Burkina Faso’s new President Roch Marc Christian Kabore, “In market terms it’s an activity which is no longer very attractive for us”
Monsanto is also a major donor to the Clinton Foundation at $501,250 to $1,006,000 and in 2015 she appointed long-time Monsanto lobbyist Jerry Crawford as adviser to her “Ready for Hillary” super PAC.
4) She Wants To Force Vaccines On You And Your Kids
When it comes to a woman’s choice, Hillary could not be less tolerant on the issue of vaccines. In a tweet from February 2015, she put her impudence on display as she associated vaccination with the earth being round.
What she mistakenly left out however, is that fact that flu shots have been verified by independent labs to contain a 51 parts per million concentration of mercury, an extremely toxic heavy metal, which is at levels 25,000 times the amount allowed by the EPA in municipal water supplies.
She also forgot to mention the hundreds of children who were permanently brain damaged by the swine flu vaccine, receiving $90 million in compensation from the UK government.
Among [those damaged] is Josh Hadfield, 8, from Somerset, who is on anti-narcolepsy drugs costing [$20,000] a year to help him stay awake during the school day.
“If you make him laugh, he collapses. His memory is shot. There is no cure. He says he wishes he hadn’t been born. I feel incredibly guilty about letting him have the vaccine,” said his mother Caroline Hadfield, 43.
Despite a 2011 warning from the European Medicines Agency against using the vaccine on those under 20 and a study indicating a 13-fold heightened risk of narcolepsy in vaccinated children, GSK has refused to acknowledge a link. – Peter Todd, a lawyer who represented many of the claimants
5) She’s a Friend of Big Pharma and the Mass Psychiatric Drugging of the Population
Although she claims it to be her number one enemy, she is rolling in dough from the highly lucrative pharmaceutical industry. According to a report by the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit organization set up to track big money influence in politics, she took nearly $600,000 from big pharma during the 2016 race alone. The Clinton Foundation also received $1,010,000 to $5,025,000 from Pfitzer, a top pharmaceutical company.
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty, to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” – United States Constitution, Preamble
‘Phillip Schneider is a student and contributing author to Waking Times. His work can be found on a variety of outlets including Investment Watch, Prevent Disease and Intellihub. His interests are diverse, but with a focus on natural health and individual liberty. You can visit his blog, the Freedom Notebook, or follow him on Twitter if you would like to keep up with his work.’